By the mid 1970s I had long been a comic book fan and “keeper.” I gave up regularly reading comics in 1977 and I have, in recent years, often been asked why. There were several reasons as the industry went through great changes in that era. You are certainly entitled to agree or disagree with my views, and I hope you will post your experiences. BUT PLEASE DO NOT explain why so many changes were made, I am responding to just what was in the comics
Reason #1: Girls. And money. I
wanted to date and the price of comics was getting out of hand. In 1965, for example, I could afford to buy all
ten Marvel Age comics for just over a dollar each month. (By “Marvel Age” I
mean all the super-hero titles and Sgt.
Fury. I am excluding reprints teen-age romance and westerns.) At
twelve cents each, it cost $1.20 per month, perhaps $1.45 if an Annual came
out. As a measurement, minimum wage then
was $1.25, so working about one hour a month paid for my comics.
I had what I call the “90%” rule. That is, I usually liked nine out of the ten comics published each month from 1961 to 1968.
I had what I call the “90%” rule. That is, I usually liked nine out of the ten comics published each month from 1961 to 1968.
For 36 years, 1933-1969, the price
of comics increased only 20 percent. In the next seven years comic book prices tripled
from 12 cents to 35 cents. But Marvel
and DC also added “Giant-Size” and other specials that cost way more.
Let’s see what comics would set
you back in 1976. In an average month, late in 1976 Marvel had 29 regular
titles at 30 cents each, which came to $8.70; 4 “giant-size/annual” at 50 cents = $2.00; 4 magazines
at $1.00 cents and a Treasury edition at $1.50 for a grand total cost of $16.25.
(Granted, the number of comics produced each month had tripled and the single
copy cost doubled.)
The minimum wage in 1976 was
$2.30. So it would take almost 9 hours, with tax deductions, at minimum wage to
buy all those comics Marvel produced in one month. I guess many readers, if
they were anything like I was, then began to pick and choose. But I was also losing at the “90%” rule. I
was enjoying maybe one quarter to half the comics, but more on that later.
Reason #2: I had basically given up on DC and other
companies. DC comics were written for
younger people. This not only meant simplified plot and little character
development, but they operated with the knowledge that they lost their readers
at age 15 or 16. A.C.G. was now long gone as was
Dell. Charlton and Western seemed to come and go on the newsstand, mostly printing
licensed properties of children’s T.V. shows.
Reason #3: I was disappointed when Jack Kirby left
Marvel in 1970 and went to DC. I
expected Kirby to have an influence at DC and that their comics would grow up.
They didn’t. I am a huge Kirby fan. Here you had the single-most important graphic
artist of his generation, who had co-created a staggering number of characters
that are still among the most popular heroes of all time, and his output for DC
was disappointing. I found Kirby’s New Gods and Fourth World hard to
read. Kirby learned to write in the style of
Joe Simon in the 1940s, when dialogue was all plot. By 1970, Stan Lee’s influence
in writing was prevalent. Kirby failed here. Despite an impressive number of new
characters (including the Demon, OMAC, and Kamandi) none lasted long enough to
influence DC very much. (I did, however, like The Losers, Spirit World
and In the Days of the Mob.)
Reason #5: Loss of Vision. The Marvel Age began with Stan Lee, Jack
Kirby, Steve Ditko and Don Heck creating the Marvel Universe. They were aided
and abetted by Larry Lieber and Dick Ayers.
They produced some of the best comics ever. Roy
Thomas, Gene Colan, John Buscema and John Romita were brought in mostly to
continue what the “Big Four” began. In 1973 Stan Lee becomes publisher and his vision
of a single unified universe seemed to evaporate as new editors came and went quickly. By 1977 Marvel had quickly expanded from 10 to 40
titles and new writers and artists had to be brought in. Many writers were not “trained” in the Marvel
way, concentrating on the story plot only, not on characterization or
personality. I felt the artwork also suffered.
Reason #6: Many titles for same characters.
Continuity, not seen at the other companies,
was a paramount of the Marvel success. Characters grew and their personalities
become part of the story line. At DC, it seemed, all heroes had to appear in at
least two comics. In any given month, Superman appeared in eight separate
titles and Batman at least four. With different writers and editors it was impossible to have any sort
of continuity and there was no growth. In 1965, you could pick up a Superman comic from
1961 and find no difference in character development. Lois Lane continued to
conspire to find out his secret identity, Jimmy Olsen continued to turn into a
giant turtle man, and Superman would appear old, fat, bald, tall, short or
disabled. There were no adventures, there was just gimmicks.
By the early 1970s Spider-Man had Amazing
Spider-Man, Spectacular Spider-Man, and Marvel
Two in One, and Giant-Size Spider-Man
along with appearing in reprints of Marvel
Tales and in Spidey Super-Stories
(from the creators of Sesame Street.) By
the mid 1970s all major characters appeared in two books. The worst offender was
the Defenders where the “loners” Dr. Strange, Silver Surfer, the Hulk teamed up.
Here’s a secret and it is MY
opinion. I REALLY think Stan never
thought the characters would go on longer than 15 years. Other than Superman,
no super-hero at that time, had successfully endured. (Batman and Wonder Woman
were failing in the early 1960s)
Reason #7: I AM NOT a great
horror fan, but I enjoyed Warrens’ Creepy
and Eerie in the beginning because it
had great artists, sometimes fie writing and was just not another comic book. So
was excited when Marvel announced it was entering the Black and White magazine
world. Marvel
burst on the scene here producing a huge amount of similar comics, rather that
slowly bring them out and developing them.
They were erratic and expensive. They featured many text stories (which
I didn’t read) and a boatload of reprints from color comics, but now in black
and white. At this time Marvel has MANY color comics, at a lower price,
reprinting stories from the same era. It is interesting that the horror
magazines (Dracula Lives, Vampire Tales, Tales of the Zombie, Monsters
Unleashed, and Savage Tales) faded by issue #12. Conan, Hulk, Crazy (humor) Planet of the
Apes, Deadly Hands of Kung Fu lasted longer.
I really, really began to see that Marvel was more interested in quantity
a then quality.
Reason 8: Also, to my surprise, I
would buy a comic with a new cover but a reprint would be inside with some explanation
on why there was a reprint. I was paying
with new money, but getting an old comic. The page count in the Marvel comics, early
1960s, when comics were 1/3 the prices was often 24, then 20 pages for the full
length comics as 22 of the anthologies such as Tales of Suspense. They were down
to 17 pages by 1976.
Reason 9: Titles began to come and go quickly, without any resolution. The Black Panther in Jungle Action, Skull the Slayer, Omega, Man-Wolf and many others had brief comic book runs, but ended on cliff-hangers that would not be resolved during this period (Many were resolved years later.) This, to me, should like of respect to the readers. Even the WORST titles were selling over 150,000 a month, yet Marvel seem to show no need to satisfy those readers who were probably reading their other comics.
Man-Wolf in Creatures on the Loose |
Killraven |
I loved John Kowalski in "War is Hell" |
Reason #10: Lost connection with
readers: There always seemed to be a connection between the comic companies and
the readers. DC had Superman of America, Archie had a fan club and Marvel had
not just the M.M.M.S but FOOM and magazines that went out to fans. When Stan
left as editor that connection was lost.
Reason #11: There were THREE
major changes in comic book production at Marvel that really made the comics
virtually unreadable to by the mid-1970s.
- 1 By 1970, to save money on negatives, the industry shrunk the size of the boards used for original artwork by about 1/3. This meant that artists would be putting in far less detail and background work.
- 2. Due to inflation there was aa paper shortage in the 1970s and its price went up. Therefore, the paper publishers used was of significantly less quality and the quality of the artwork, already diminished, got worse.
- 3. Marvel decided NOT to use the traditional metal printing plates and switched to the cheaper PLASTIC plates. (Insiders called them paper plates.) The combinations of these three events lead to comics that literally were unreadable. The lines and lettering blurred, the details were gone, and the colors seemed blotted on. This was, for me, the last straw.
It doesn't show up well here, but this is a scan from the original Deathlok story. It was hard to read and, blown up to its regular size was blurry. |
This is from the recent Masterworks, reproduced correctly |
I wonder if I just outgrew comics. There was just so many times I could read about Galactus coming to Earth and getting a new herald, or the Sub-Mariner attacking the Surface World or the Red Skull, thought dead returning. None of my girlfriends ever cared about them and thought they were childish to read. When I stopped, I did look into older comics such as EC. But I don’t remember ever missing the new comics.
As a kid, I told people I read
Superman, Spider-Man, Fantastic Four, and Avengers and so on. As an adult I realized what I was reading was Stan
Lee, Jack Kirby, Steve Ditko, Jim Steranko and Roy Thomas.
When Kirby leaves Marvel in 1977,
and all the other original creators were gone, I left too. My Silver Age was over.