The Big John Buscema Book
From the Casal Solleric De Mallorca gallery
If you are a John Buscema enthusiast, and I am, this looks
like an almost irresistible book to buy. The wonderful images of covers,
printed pages and the vast amount of original art reproductions make this book
impressive. Sadly, there is a lot less here than meets the eye. And I am disappointed.
I mentioned the artwork, and will get back to that in a bit.
But let me bring up three other important points.
The typeset in the book is incredibly small, I would say no
bigger than 8 point type, when most books are published in 10 or 12 pt. If you are over 40 or need reading glasses,
OR if you are over 50 and use reading glasses, this text will be hard to see. The
typesetting is even changed starting on page 185, another distraction. In fact,
this is an easy to read book if it wasn’t so hard to read.
And exactly half the text is in another language, Spanish.
That’s right, next to every column in English, is another column in Spanish,
with (I presume) translated text. For the cover price of $60, (Amazon $32) they
should have printed two separate editions, WITH BIGGER TYPE, one in English and
one in Spanish. Our Spanish reading amigos will also have trouble with the all
English footnotes.
There is no “official writer” credited with authoring
this book but Florentino Florez is credited with writing the preface. The book is also written from the perspective
of one person, so I assume it is F.F.
So, with so many of the 300 pages filled with pictures,
there are, perhaps, 100 pages of text.
But we must divide that by 2, one for each language, so there are about
50 pages of text to tell the story of John Buscema. This not a biography but an
overview of his work, not his private life. While I did not feel the author was
rushed, he was brief.
The book is heavily researched using Alter Ego and the Kirby Collector. For that reason I found little
new in the beginning, having read the original interviews when they first appeared. The author relies
heavily on the John
Romita book. All three are printed by Tomorrow’s Publications. So if you have read those interviews,
there is not a whole of new material in the beginning. The rest of the book, perhaps now 40 pages, is
more original, but it still relies on those publications.
We do start off learning that while working for Martin Goodman
in 1950 (Atlas, now known as Marvel) Buscema made $75 a week, but later found
work at such places as Hillman and St. John’s for $30-$35 a page. The Comics
Code era changed everything and he was down to $21 a page. After drawing Spartacus for Dell in 1960, he
would leave the comic book industry for 6 years and went into the advertising
industry. When Stan Lee offered him, in 1966, the same salary he made in advertising,
but he could work at home, Buscema returned to comics and drew Nick Fury in Strange
Tales #150. The authors take us through that era, one series at a time, often
discussing the inkers who he feels improved or diminished Buscema’s work.
The Avengers segment was interesting and he got into his
opinions of Buscema’s inkers, (The only time Sal is mentioned is as an inker,
there is no history between them given.) but the content fills up less than a
page. The two most interesting pieces, for me, was on the Silver Surfer
and the prolong piece on Conan. Since
the Avengers and the Surfer were originally Kirby pieces, the writer is careful
here. He mentions the influence Kirby had on comics, and on Buscema, but always
mentions how Buscema expanded on and improved on Kirby’s intentions, without every
putting him down. He is never so careful with Lee, saying that while Lee handled simple projects well he was not very successful with complex projects. He blames Lee for the failure
of the Silver Surfer; saying Lee took the character too seriously and had a formalistic approach.
“Buscema had assumed Kirby's legacy and he had
taken it to the next level. He took the explosions, the distorted gestures and
the spectacular planning and adapted them into a realistic, solid style, full
of energy and elegance. It enabled him to create panels like the one where the
Surfer, as a new St. Francis of Assisi, rests amongst a horde of extraordinary
beasts. Or those pages where he reaches Asgard and stands up to Thor, when his
friends leap over the table to defend him, all of it a marvel of
expressiveness. Lee tried to, but he never succeeded. He would claim that his
scripts took him in another direction, but he couldn't do it. In short: Lee had
been overtaken by Buscema, and he knew it.”
“I
consider Stan Lee's legacy no more important than some advocate. His mistake is
not in his artistic goals, but rather in the way he tried to be something he
wasn't. He was very good at uncomplicated adventures, but was out of his depth
in more complex ones. The Silver Surfer is a noble effort that achieves great
results in the field of drawing, but ends up failing in the storyline. This
might have brought about the frustration felt by the publisher and the
scriptwriter, which could in turn explain his clash with Buscema. It may not be
true, but it sounds good...”
The Illustrations in the book are outstanding. The
selections are wonderful. In some ways
it feels like the new Artist Editions that are out there, with so much original
art although there are no complete stories. There are many illustrations of
printed, full color pages that are just great to see. And lots of covers. You
really get to see how inkers added or took away from his art. I enjoyed seeing the
original art of an unpublished Surfer Cover next to the published one. Tarzan, the
Avengers, Conan, his Dell work are so well represented here.
The book also has a very nicely researched and laid out Buscema checklist at the back
The book also has a very nicely researched and laid out Buscema checklist at the back
It’s a hard book to rate.
The pictures are an “A+”
The layout and format of the book is a “D”, it’s hard to
read and half is wasted in another language.
The text content is good, but there is not enough depth or
originality. “C?”
I guess that all averages out to a “B.” But check to see if you can read it first.
I'll look out for it in my local comics shop, but I don't think I'll be buying it. Did you mean to type that the book is NOT heavily researched, because what follows seems to suggest the opposite if you didn't? Interesting review, I once had a couple of Bettie Page books with that double language thing going on - not the best way to grab readers.
ReplyDeleteKid, I am sorry I wasn't clear and will fix it. The book was HEAVILY researched, they did a lot of reading of Alter Ego. So little in the beginning is new material, they just quote from the magazines and the Romita book.And they give footnotes.
ReplyDeleteAh, I see. I thought you were saying that it wasn't heavily researched and implying that the writer had merely copied Alter Ego. Funny how two different meanings can be read into things, eh?
ReplyDeleteWell, according to at least one of John Morrow's writing staff, ANYTHING that is published these days was copied from Alter Ego...
ReplyDeleteThis is an exhibition catalogue it wasn't written by Casal Solleric, it is an Exhibition Catalog published by Casal Solleric De Mallorca gallery, put togeher for the exhibition of John Buscema original art in Mallorca, Spain. http://comicbookcollectorsblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/john-buscema-exhibition-in-palma-spain.html
ReplyDeleteCasal Solleric published a similar book for an exhibition of original art by Wally Wood. The book on Wood is going to be republished by IDW.
Big John Buscema
ReplyDeleteI have discovered that I am a racist because I did not give Big John Buscema
Book a rave review!
I liked the artwork in the Buscema book, a lot, I gave that 5 stars. But the
text was very small and hard to read, partially because exactly half the space
for text went to a Spanish translation. I said that ZI wished they had put out
two editions, once in Spanish and one in English. Spanish speaking people who
need reading glasses would have the same problem I did.
And I felt that the text was off based. For example, the writer contends that
the Silver Surfer failures was all Stan's fault. he didn't add humor and that
Stan had problems with complicated plots. I disagree. Very briefly, the Surfer
was a powerful hero, like Thor, and his problem was that he was stuck on Earth,
the "Sentinel of the Spaceways" should have been allowed in space.
Anyway, I was not only called a racist, but was told that it is because of
people like me that Graphic Novels written abroad are not published here.
http://www.amazon.com/Big-John-Buscema-Comics-Drawings/dp/1613771959/ref=cm_rdp_\
product
I kept my copy and made no complaints to Amazon. But on the Masterworks pages
and a few others, I see a lot of people returned the book because they could not
read it. But it's worth keeping just for the pictures.
Well, Amazon has stopped selling it because of problems they don't site. But another poster blamed that all on me. I wasthe cause of that too! One mixed review and it's my fault!
I just love how quickly people blame everyone! And apparently, nothing but great
reviews are allowed.